A Man Who Cannot Provide for His Family

Whatsoever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible - Family - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / Full general / Family / Whatever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible (19313 Views)

Guy Brought His Oyinbo Wife Back Home & His Family unit Members Were Astonished -pics / Beautiful Pictures Of A Nairalander And His Family / Any Woman That Tin can't Cook Is Highly Irresponsible. (two) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Answer) (Get Downwards)

Whatsoever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by butanep(m): half-dozen:06am On Oct 02, 2014

Any man that can't provide the basic need( food, clothing and shelter) for his family is highly irresponsible and not besides fit to be chosen a Man. Tradition demands that Men should accept care of their family( married woman and children) and also provide the basic need for them so the family can avowal of a good for you and brighter generation. The only exception to this is when the man is an handicap or disable or lost his job due to 1 reason or the other. But for a full fleshed able body man that can't provide the basic need of the family is worth cipher and grossly irresponsible. Infact he is a failure to manhood... The Man is ought to be the caput and bread winner of the home no affair how influential or rich the woman is... the man is ought to take responsibility while the woman is there to aid when crisis arise in the family unit. So when a man fail in taking responsibility past providing for his family, it merely means, the man has wasted over fifteen to 20 years of his youthful period. I wonder the type of generation such kind of homo volition produce, because the chief gene that bring upward a bright and salubrious family lies primarily on the potentials of the man. Therefore an irresponsible man might cease upward producing an irresponsible family unit at the finish, because such family will never live a happy life except with God intervention. This is the reason while it get very necessary for a man to be resourceful in his youthful age by either going to school or learning a vocation or a trade, because with these the man can at least finish a better life and produce a healthy family with great ambitions Show me the caliber of a family and the nature of life the wife and children are living... I volition tell you how responsible the man is...

Re: Whatsoever Man That Tin can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible past lightswitch: 6:23am On Oct 02, 2014

Not everything in life is black or white, shades of grayness abound. 4 Likes

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 6:43am On Oct 02, 2014

There are a lot of other things that tin make a man irresponsible and many irresponsible men actually hide under the guise of "I am provinding everything my family unit needs" The men who sit down in bars and beer parlours after work and sharing lewd jokes with his friends and his kids are in bed asleep before he comes back the early hours of the morning is iresponsible. A man who abuses his married woman verbally, physically, emotionaly, financialy etc just becasue he is the breadwinner is irresponsible A man who has affairs all over the place and no Corper, new starter, educatee, trainnee is safe under his management is irresponsible Responsibility comprises of a lot of things. Even men who talk likewise much, drink also much, spend unwisely and cant practice anything without involving outsiders etc is irresponsible. 13 Likes 1 Share

Re: Any Homo That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 7:04am On Oct 02, 2014

A counter thread....... ane Similar

Re: Any Human That Tin't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by greatgod2012(f): 7:11am On Oct 02, 2014

This is the summary of your thread, @op 1Timothy5:8....... But if anyone does not provide for his own, and specially for those of his household, he has denied the organized religion and he is worse than an infidel(unbeliever).

Re: Whatever Human being That Can't Provide The Bones Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by greatgod2012(f): 7:22am On October 02, 2014

In your counter thread here, https://www.nairaland.com/1927330/adult female-cant-melt-highly-irresponsible, my stand is that, there is nothing wrong if men likewise know how to cook and carry out some housechores in guild to give a helping hand to their wives when and where necessary, afterall, marriage is all near ii people agreeing to get ane and loving each other. In this also, there is zip incorrect for the woman to give a helping manus financially, since the two of them are in the best interest of each other. In determination, in marriage, both the husband and wife accept to be responsible to each other in every area that would make them to exist happy with each other, not only in food grooming by the woman and coin provision by the man. Information technology is well. iv Likes

Re: Any Man That Tin't Provide The Bones Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by Dygeasy(m): vii:31am On Oct 02, 2014

In Nigeria, there are different definitions of irresponsibility. There's a difference between 'cannot provide' and 'will not provide' 2 Likes

Re: Whatever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible past Nobody: 8:02am On Oct 02, 2014

butanep: Any human that can't provide the basic need( nutrient, article of clothing and shelter) for his family unit is highly irresponsible and not also fit to exist called a Man. Tradition demands that Men should take intendance of their family unit( married woman and children) and also provide the basic demand for them so the family can boast of a healthy and brighter generation. The only exception to this is when the man is an handicap or disable or lost his job due to ane reason or the other. Merely for a full fleshed able body human that can't provide the basic demand of the family is worth nil and grossly irresponsible. Infact he is a failure to manhood... The Man is ought to be the head and bread winner of the domicile no matter how influential or rich the woman is... the homo is ought to take responsibility while the woman is there to assistance when crunch arise in the family. So when a human being fail in taking responsibility past providing for his family, information technology simply means, the man has wasted over 15 to 20 years of his youthful period. I wonder the type of generation such kind of man will produce, because the main factor that bring up a brilliant and healthy family lies primarily on the potentials of the man. Therefore an irresponsible human being might end up producing an irresponsible family at the end, because such family unit will never live a happy life except with God intervention. This is the reason while it become very necessary for a man to be resourceful in his youthful age past either going to school or learning a vocation or a trade, because with these the man can at to the lowest degree end a better life and produce a good for you family with great ambitions Prove me the caliber of a family and the nature of life the wife and children are living... I volition tell you how responsible the human being is... well said. Its true that they are then many things that can make a man irresponsible just while he his working on the other, these in one case are very of import & he should non run away for this important once. I have always said information technology that once a man tin provide a domicile & put nutrient on the table he his proficient to go while also making plans for the childrens didactics.

Re: Whatever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: viii:25am On Oct 02, 2014

real22: well said. Its true that they are so many things that tin can make a man irresponsible but while he his working on the other, these once are very important & he should not run away for this important in one case. I take always said it that once a human can provide a domicile & put food on the table he his good to get while also making plans for the childrens education. I agree to a certain betoken. Yes its very important to put food on the table and provide shelter, but not at the detriment of other too very of import things. He is practiced to go because he pays rent and buys bags of rice, but what if he is a womaniser, brings home STD'south and beats his married woman? Is he yet responsible? is he withal good to become? The only thing the OP focussed on was "money" and that is why then many women today are telling stories that touch; because they were only focussing in the mans pocket and his "potential" Responsibility is all round . . not just pockets of information technology I dont feel comfortable at the overall message that this topic is suggesting. Dont get me wrong . .its a very bad matter for a capable man non to provide for his family due to lazyness or grandiose ideas. 6 Likes

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: eight:41am On Oct 02, 2014

chaircover: I concur to a certain indicate. Yes its very of import to put food on the table and provide shelter, just not at the detriment of other besides very important things. He is good to go because he pays rent and buys bags of rice, but what if he is a womaniser, brings domicile STD's and beats his wife? Is he all the same responsible? is he all the same proficient to go? The only thing the OP focussed on was "money" and that is why so many women today are telling stories that touch; because they were simply focussing in the mans pocket and his "potential" Responsibleness is all round . . not just pockets of it I dont feel comfortable at the overall message that this topic is suggesting. Dont get me wrong . .its a very bad thing for a capable man non to provide for his family due to lazyness or grandiose ideas. I truly don't no how u view marriage only to me being faithful to ur spouse & respecting your spouse has no pick in marriage. That is my mind set. Only the area the op talked about its the human being's conclusion. I merely hope u understand what I mean. one Like

Re: Whatever Man That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by cococandy(f): viii:53am On October 02, 2014

Don't listen the Op. He's merely one way minded.if the human being can provide and so he's responsible,if the woman can cook then she's responsible. What if they are all practiced in every other aspect but can't provide or cook.does that make them totally irresponsible? Are those the only criteria for assessment? @OP there are responsible women who can't cook only because their upbringing didn't beget them the opportunity to learn and at present they live the kind of lifestlye that makes 5hr sleep a luxury. So a cook lives in the house with them and does the cooking. And the family unit is happy.does that make her irresponsible? While there are men who tin can't provide not because of job loss or disability. Only for the unproblematic reason that their efforts don't yield plenty result. With prices sky-rocketing in almost every expanse and on everything on daily basis. Many men are finding stayng adrift harder and harder. So without an equal or fifty-fifty bigger contribution from their wives,the family will suffer. In fact switching of roles may turn out to be their best option at that stage considering they just have to make information technology somehow. Does that make the homo irresponsible?.if you're going to gauge men like that,then you know there are many irresponsible men everywhere. chaircover: I agree to a certain point. Yes its very important to put food on the table and provide shelter, simply non at the detriment of other also very important things. He is skilful to become considering he pays rent and buys bags of rice, but what if he is a womaniser, brings home STD's and beats his married woman? Is he withal responsible? is he still good to go? The simply thing the OP focussed on was "money" and that is why so many women today are telling stories that affect; considering they were only focussing in the mans pocket and his "potential" Responsibility is all round . . not but pockets of it I dont experience comfy at the overall message that this topic is suggesting. Dont become me wrong . .its a very bad affair for a capable human being non to provide for his family due to lazyness or grandiose ideas. 3 Likes

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Rapsainot(m): 8:59am On October 02, 2014

There are some men that fall into this due to one thing or the other, yet they still tend to be more responsible than those that can fifty-fifty provide in excess

Re: Any Human being That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Rapsainot(grand): 9:00am On Oct 02, 2014

greatgod2012: This is the summary of your thread, @op 1Timothy5:8....... Simply if anyone does not provide for his own, and specially for those of his household, he has denied the religion and he is worse than an pagan(unbeliever). stop misquoting the Bible in this type of situation, what if he was sacked?

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by parrotibaba(m): 9:29am On Oct 02, 2014

@op na so u wan mk front end page again with ur "irresponsible" tagged topic

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by sexybash(f): ix:43am On Oct 02, 2014

Oluwa naputam any man dat refuse to provide for the family Nigh times women aid and abet this men to do poo Y'all give birth to the beginning child he doesn't have responsibility Do non take in for the second :-/ Suse the damn contraceptive. Some men are internally useless If you tin't take care of kids so you lot don't deserve one Uncomplicated 1 Like

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Bones Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible past butanep(m): 9:49am On Oct 02, 2014

Rapsainot: At that place are some men that autumn into this due to 1 thing or the other, yet they still tend to be more responsible than those that tin even provide in backlog so mention the things that make then fall into the category... any total fleshed able man that can't provide such basic need is a total failure, no matter what... He is not worth to exist called a man. He should ve been in his father's house... equally far you can provide for your family... that's a step to responsibility... Get it clear...

Re: Whatever Man That Tin can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible past butanep(m): ix:52am On Oct 02, 2014

sexybash: Oluwa naputam whatsoever man dat pass up to provide for the family Most times women aid and abet this men to do poo You give nativity to the outset child he doesn't take responsibility Exercise not take in for the second :-/ Suse the damn contraceptive. Some men are internally useless If you can't take care of kids so you don't deserve one Simple are useless when they are irresponsible for no physical reason... you re kind of harsh on men

Re: Whatsoever Man That Can't Provide The Bones Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by butanep(m): ix:53am On Oct 02, 2014

Rapsainot: stop misquoting the Bible in this type of situation, what if he was sacked? That ways y'all tin't read very well. Read the slice, you will see the conditions...

Re: Any Human being That Tin't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 10:12am On Oct 02, 2014

This @op sef By d way, i know a case where d wife is d breadwinner,hubby is at habitation. No job yet simply a very good cook. Infact, he takes intendance of every every in d house. I call up i've shared their story b4. And they r loving couple. So i tin now deduct d couple are irresponsible? Hehehehee @op 2 Likes

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Bones Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible past Nobody: 10:28am On October 02, 2014

copy cat thread

Re: Any Human being That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by jazinogold(m): ten:29am On October 02, 2014

*shakes head¤ when d smooth road of life becomes rough n the chimps r down...your married woman now becomes d pillar to uphold northward back up yous! Does that makes you lot an irresponsible husband? May God help us, in our thoughts and fashion of reasoning!

Re: Any Human being That Can't Provide The Bones Demand For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by Sophyrocks: 10:30am On Oct 02, 2014

chaircover: There are a lot of other things that can make a human being irresponsible and many irresponsible men really hide under the guise of "I am provinding everything my family needs" The men who sit in bars and beer parlours after work and sharing lewd jokes with his friends and his kids are in bed asleep before he comes back the early on hours of the morn is iresponsible. A man who abuses his wife verbally, physically, emotionaly, financialy etc just becasue he is the breadwinner is irresponsible A homo who has diplomacy all over the place and no Corper, new starter, educatee, trainnee is safe under his management is irresponsible Responsibility comprises of a lot of things. Even men who talk too much, drink too much, spend unwisely and cant do anything without involving outsiders etc is irresponsible. GBAM!! The Op would take added all of these you have typed. Being irresponsible isnt only nigh inability to provide, its as well about your lifestyle. Thank you for saying it as it is!!

Re: Whatsoever Man That Tin't Provide The Bones Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by SAMBARRY: 11:06am On Oct 02, 2014

Chair cover why are you lot wasting your talent here. Go and open church building. I will buy keyboard and drum set for your ministry continue from where the likes of bimbo odukoya stopped abi don't you want to have individual jets with entourage around you when yous are moving around. No dey waste matter ya talent for nl.e no pass like this to be a London Large girl 1 Like

Re: Any Human That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 11:10am On October 02, 2014

So providing for the family is the measurement of responsibility? So in one case he can provide,every other flaws can be ignored? I know so many people that provides for the family unit,yet are good womanizer,and a drunkard. Op,please don't be myopic in your view,life is too short. 1 Similar

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible past shizzle11(chiliad): 12:42pm On Oct 02, 2014

chaircover: There are a lot of other things that can brand a human irresponsible and many irresponsible men actually hide under the guise of "I am provinding everything my family needs" The men who sit in bars and beer parlours later piece of work and sharing lewd jokes with his friends and his kids are in bed asleep before he comes dorsum the early hours of the morning is iresponsible. A man who abuses his wife verbally, physically, emotionaly, financialy etc merely becasue he is the breadwinner is irresponsible A man who has affairs all over the place and no Corper, new starter, educatee, trainnee is condom under his management is irresponsible Responsibility comprises of a lot of things. Even men who talk too much, potable too much, spend unwisely and cant do annihilation without involving outsiders etc is irresponsible. We don hear, we know and we concord to an extent. I see how quick y'all are to jump on this thread to comment and outline numerous other ways a human being can be termed 'irresponsible'. Nevertheless the op again made valid points here, just similar he did in his penultimate thread and like you lot rightly observed, it is non only the inability of a homo to provide for his family that amounts to 'irresponsibility', in other words i agree with yous to a large extent on the in a higher place. Need i remind yous that this is a counter thread past the op, on his earlier thread to create a more balanced and unbiased view. https://www.nairaland.com/1927330/woman-deceit-cook-highly-irresponsible While 'some' of your fellow women were blabbing all over the thread and some feminists at some betoken hijacked the thread with their inane outbursts, y'all were no where to be found to highlight to united states of america other numerous ways a woman tin exist regarded as 'irresponsible'. (tell me yous didnt see the thread). I sense the hypocrisy not mindinding the fact that i consider your to a higher place points valid. My point is, you attacked this thread with and so much energy and passion which nosotros didnt see in the earlier thread by the same op.

Re: Any Homo That Tin can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by shizzle11(k): 1:01pm On October 02, 2014

Op over again you made a skillful point, simply like i said in the other thread that information technology is not only a womans disability to cook that can be termed 'irresponsible', a woman tin be irresponsible in the kitchen but useful in other areas (even thou i also stated conspicuously that i cant and will never a marry a woman who doesn't know how to cook), same logic applies hither. A man tin still exist 'irresponsible' even if he provides sufficiently for his family.

Re: Whatever Human That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible past Rapsainot(k): 1:31pm On Oct 02, 2014

butanep: so mention the things that make then autumn into the category... any full fleshed able man that tin can't provide such basic demand is a total failure, no matter what... He is not worth to be called a human . He should ve been in his begetter'south house... as far y'all tin can provide for your family... that's a step to responsibility... Get it articulate... there are some circumstances in which an able man won't exist able to cater for his family unit.

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Bones Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible past kreamidiva(f): two:01pm On October 02, 2014

chaircover: He is good to go because he pays rent and buys bags of rice, but what if he is a womaniser, brings home STD's and beats his married woman? Is he all the same responsible? is he nevertheless skilful to go? Aye. He'southward still good to become. Expert to become to the grave!

Re: Any Man That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible past butanep(m): 2:07pm On Oct 02, 2014

Rapsainot: at that place are some circumstances in which an able man won't be able to cater for his family. so mention some of the circumstances where an able homo tin't provide, if not what I ve mention to a higher place...

Re: Whatsoever Homo That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family unit Is Highly Irresponsible by butanep(1000): two:23pm On Oct 02, 2014

Most of you guyz don't understand the significant of IRRESPONSIBLE... please check your lexicon very well. Any ane that tin't have responsibleness of his\her duty or duties is irresponsible...be it a human being or woman... The chief role of a human is to take proper care of the family... by merely providing the basic need of the family. So I come across no reason where a full fleshed able trunk man can't provide the basic need for the family. Women are there to assist the family but not to take full charge... How can a woman provide the money I use to swallow, pay for rent and fabric my self... God preclude bad thing...Non when am alive. [/b]I must take charge of my family past providing the basic needs and my wife will be there to aid me not the opposite. [b]I echo, any homo that can't provide the basic need of the family is non only irresponsible simply a failure.. there might also be other reasons that can make a human irresponsible but this is the MAIN reason. ane Similar

Re: Whatever Human That Can't Provide The Basic Demand For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 3:46pm On Oct 02, 2014

shizzle11: We don hear, nosotros know and we agree to an extent. I see how quick you are to jump on this thread to annotate and outline numerous other ways a human being can be termed 'irresponsible'. However the op once more made valid points here, just like he did in his penultimate thread and similar you rightly observed, it is non only the disability of a man to provide for his family that amounts to 'irresponsibility', in other words i agree with you to a large extent on the above. Need i remind you that this is a counter thread by the op, on his earlier thread to create a more than counterbalanced and unbiased view. https://www.nairaland.com/1927330/adult female-cant-cook-highly-irresponsible While 'some' of your fellow women were blabbing all over the thread and some feminists at some point hijacked the thread with their inane outbursts, y'all were no where to be found to highlight to us other numerous means a woman can be regarded as 'irresponsible'. (tell me you didnt see the thread). I sense the hypocrisy not mindinding the fact that i consider your higher up points valid. My point is, you attacked this thread with then much free energy and passion which we didnt encounter in the earlier thread by the same op. Kickoff of all I dont accept to open all threads talk less of commenting on all of them . . .Practise you know how many threads are on NL? Secondly I am not joined at the hip to anyone here, so that someone saying/not saying something doesnt mean I endorse it or disagree with it. . . . I tin call back for my cocky As for gender wars, feminism or menimism, or whatever count me out cos I dont have time for it. Of the people I dear near in my life, I worked out that there are more men than women. . . I estimate that tells you something I have a father, brothers, uncles, brothers, biological and not biological . .they are all men. I have male person friends also. When I become to bed at night I sleep with a man All this femmenism and menenism (I deceit even spell it sef) is simply internet rima oris braggado to me . .. . Many of you go abode to wifes, husbands, mums, dads, sisters, brothers, nephews and neices so I dont really empathise what all the gender state of war is virtually. I say it every bit I see it, from my own eyes; If the man is wrong I say it and if the woman is wrong I say information technology also. Funny; yesterday I was accused albeit in jest, of setting the femininst movement back by years with a statement that I made & today its the opposite LOL you are so into this gender war matter that you were unable to read between the lines of my mail service. I was in actual fact talking to both men and women In my second mail service which has not been modified and I was subtly pointing out to women not to look at a mans pocket alone as the only means of picking the right homo but look at the homo every bit a whole and then they dont end up telling stories that touch. It is well sha. Equally for me I honey men . . and women too and no I am non bi 3 Likes

Re: Any Human That Can't Provide The Basic Need For His Family Is Highly Irresponsible by Nobody: 3:47pm On Oct 02, 2014

SAMBARRY: Chair cover why are y'all wasting your talent hither. Go and open up church building. I will buy keyboard and drum gear up for your ministry continue from where the likes of bimbo odukoya stopped abi don't you want to have private jets with entourage around yous when you lot are moving effectually. No dey waste ya talent for nl.due east no pass like this to be a London Big daughter Muah Muah Muah Sweetheart You nonetheless fit do me a favour Dont carp buying me the drums . . .merely send me the money by Western Union God bless y'all as yous comply i Similar

guerrerosysion.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.nairaland.com/1929556/man-cant-provide-basic-need

Share this post